It could be a bug? Wrong thank you very much for you reply. It is very strange, rules 1,3 have active connections, but in practice they do not work. The rules 1,3 do not produce any effect and can be removed. In order, to understand better the behaviour I setup a fixed IP (192.168.1.100) to my laptop and I discovered that balanced mode works well only if it is applied to the whole network (only rule 4). These rules should work as described in the documentation (matched from top to the bottom). I cannot understand why load balancing for one specific IP does not work. However, I'm still struggling against the second problem i.e. I also added more 4G (wwan1 e wwan2) connections and the "hand-over" works well. Now I can randomly connect and disconnect, the two connections and it works well. In the meantime, I solved my first problem of load balancing between ADSL (wan) and 4G (wwan). As such load-balancing will help speed multiple separate downloads or traffic generated from a group of source PCs all accessing different sites but it will not speed up a single download from one PC.Linux outgoing network traffic load-balancing is performed on a per-IP connection basis.mwan3 uses normal Linux policy routing to balance outgoing traffic over multiple WAN connections. ![]() It is very strange behaviour.Īccording to mwan documentation, it exploits policy routing of the linux kernel. After the test my IP has been banned (HTTP 403 forbidden error) and I cannot see the IPTV any more even if I can reach it via ping, traceroute, etc. ![]() Note: I have to repeat the test during the most crowded time on weekend. In particular, in any case (even if the IP is different) the third and fourth hops have high worst and stdev values even if the average value is normal. I also tried mtr against some companies that are closed (10-15 km) and have optical fiber connection without any great different on results).įinally, I ran mtr against the two most used IP addresses of video source (should be one for accounting and one for video stream) and the results are very similar to those of my local university. Then, I ran mtr against my "local" university (about 40 km, I live in the country side. In order to use mtr as suggested by you, I first found the IP addresses of video source via tcpdump+wireshark (as explained in my second post of this thread). Thank you for the material, I found it very interesting. Interface wan6 is unknown and tracking is down Interface wan is online and tracking is active However, only when wan is up the smart TV works. In this way, the smart TV should connect to Internet if one between wan and wwan is up. ![]() I would like to use only main wan for all traffic except for traffic coming to an specific fixed IP belonging to the smart TV. I installed successfully mwan3 package and I setup load balancing between both connections according to the documentation. In the meantime, I'm also trying to use multiple WAN connections with load balancing: main ADSL2 connection (wan) and backup 4G connection (via WiFi tethering from a smartphone) (wwan) with limited amount of monthly traffic. I will report how it works during the evening and weekend. ![]() Some benchmarks seem to give better results. Moreover, according to the documentation here, nat together with dual-dsthost and dual-srchost are more suited than triple-isolate. I made some further test by using the following setting: ingress: nat dual-dsthost diffserv4 pppoa-vcmuxĮgress: nat dual-srchost diffserv4 ack-filter-aggressive pppoa-vcmuxįirst, according to the paper, diffserv4 is better than diffserv3 since it takes into account also video tin while ack-filter-aggressive is better than ack-filter.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |